AMLTranche

Melbourne-built platform focused on property-adjacent verticals. Among the most completely documented products researched: capability claims are specific enough to verify, including SHA-256 hash chains, 7-year audit records, AWS Sydney hosting, and a $10k cash TTR blocking modal. Publishes heavily: roughly 40 blog posts plus a glossary, resources hub and comparison page. That content is a

Checked 8 October 2026Data residency: mixed

Where it is stronger

Capabilities verified here that fewer than half of comparable offerings are verified on. Worked out from the data, not written by hand.

  • Immutable audit log2 of 16 others
  • Tipping-off controls (s123)3 of 16 others
  • Threshold transaction reporting5 of 16 others
  • Adverse media screening7 of 16 others
  • Suspicious matter report workflow7 of 16 others
  • Evidence pack export7 of 16 others

Where it is weaker

Recorded with the same care as the capabilities, and not softened.

  • Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Risk assessed per designated service.Vendor states the program and ML/TF risk assessment are generated from a questionnaire that includes the services offered; per-designated-service risk ratings are not described.
  • Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Ongoing monitoring triggered by designated service and risk.Vendor states ongoing CDD runs on a risk-rated review schedule with triggers for beneficial ownership changes, large or unusual transactions and sanctions updates; triggers tied to a new designated service are not described.
  • Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Program obligations calendar.Vendor states it alerts when a program review is due and schedules annual training refreshers; tracking of effectiveness checks, governing-body reports and independent evaluation is not described (the homepage shows a static key-dates timeline).
  • Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Versioned AML program and CDD records.Vendor states the AML/CTF program is kept in the platform with version tracking and SMR amendments are chained; CDD actions are signed and timestamped in the audit log, but versioning of CDD records is not stated.
  • Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Escalation to AMLCO or manager with outcome recorded.Vendor states the SMR workflow splits staff intake from a reviewer role; it does not describe the outcome being recorded or notified back to the staff member who raised it.
  • Partly meets the Tranche 2 measure: Reliance CDD requests sent and received.Vendor states a verified CDD pack can be exported to the agent, conveyancer or lawyer on the same file, with the handoff tracked in the audit trail; an in-product request/response workflow is not described.
  • No staff training feature found anywhere on the site.
  • Does not lodge reports to AUSTRAC. SMR output is a formatted PDF pack for manual submission via AUSTRAC Online, not XML.
  • No named third-party integrations.
  • No broader transaction monitoring beyond the $10k cash TTR trigger.

Statement of capabilities

Every tracked requirement for AML/CTF & Financial Crime, shown whether or not we could establish it.

  • Verified
  • Partial
  • No
  • Not established

1Program & Governance

2 of 5

  • 1.1AML/CTF program creationVerified
  • 1.2AML risk assessmentVerified
  • 1.3Program maintenance and reviewNot established
  • 1.4Independent evaluation support (s84)Not established
  • 1.5Staff trainingNo

2CDD & Entity Work

2 of 5

  • 2.1Customer due diligenceVerified
  • 2.2Know-your-business (entity checks)Not established
  • 2.3Beneficial ownership and controlVerified
  • 2.4Enhanced due diligenceNot established
  • 2.5Reliance arrangementsNot established

3Identity Verification

2 of 3

  • 3.1Electronic identity verificationVerified
  • 3.2Biometric liveness and face matchVerified
  • 3.3Document Verification Service (DVS) accessNot established

4Screening & Monitoring

3 of 4

  • 4.1PEP and sanctions screeningVerified
  • 4.2Adverse media screeningVerified
  • 4.3Ongoing customer monitoringVerified
  • 4.4Automated transaction monitoring (bank-style rules)Partial

    Vendor states $10,000+ cash transactions are flagged automatically for TTRs and that large or unusual transactions trigger CDD review; its jewellers page says spotting structuring across linked sub-threshold payments is the operator's judgement, supported by the customer's transaction history.

5Tranche 2 Operations

0 of 7

  • 5.1Risk assessed per designated servicePartial

    Vendor states the program and ML/TF risk assessment are generated from a questionnaire that includes the services offered; per-designated-service risk ratings are not described.

  • 5.2Ongoing monitoring triggered by designated service and riskPartial

    Vendor states ongoing CDD runs on a risk-rated review schedule with triggers for beneficial ownership changes, large or unusual transactions and sanctions updates; triggers tied to a new designated service are not described.

  • 5.3Program obligations calendarPartial

    Vendor states it alerts when a program review is due and schedules annual training refreshers; tracking of effectiveness checks, governing-body reports and independent evaluation is not described (the homepage shows a static key-dates timeline).

  • 5.4Versioned AML program and CDD recordsPartial

    Vendor states the AML/CTF program is kept in the platform with version tracking and SMR amendments are chained; CDD actions are signed and timestamped in the audit log, but versioning of CDD records is not stated.

  • 5.5Escalation to AMLCO or manager with outcome recordedPartial

    Vendor states the SMR workflow splits staff intake from a reviewer role; it does not describe the outcome being recorded or notified back to the staff member who raised it.

  • 5.6Expired document alertsNot established
  • 5.7Reliance CDD requests sent and receivedPartial

    Vendor states a verified CDD pack can be exported to the agent, conveyancer or lawyer on the same file, with the handoff tracked in the audit trail; an in-product request/response workflow is not described.

6Reporting & Control

3 of 4

  • 6.1Suspicious matter report workflowVerified
  • 6.2AUSTRAC SMR XML exportNo
  • 6.3Tipping-off controls (s123)Verified
  • 6.4Threshold transaction reportingVerified

7Evidence & Extensibility

2 of 3

  • 7.1Evidence pack exportVerified
  • 7.2Immutable audit logVerified
  • 7.3API accessNot established
  • 7.4Where customer data is storedAustralia and overseas
  • 7.5Where customer data is processedAustralia and overseas

Integrations

None named on the provider's own site. If integrations matter to you, confirm directly before buying.

Request a quote or demo

Send your requirements to AMLTranche's provider. Your details are shared only with them.

AML/CTF software and services support compliance with the AML/CTF Act and Rules. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and no provider is certified, endorsed or approved by AUSTRAC unless independently evidenced.